Nvidia Rtx 2060 Vs 2060 Super
Price at present 428$ Games supported 99% Cost at present 360$ Games supported 100% Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters. Value for money To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices. General performance parameters such every bit number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing procedure, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise cess yous have to consider their criterion and gaming exam results. Note that ability consumption of some graphics cards tin can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Data on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future reckoner configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it'due south interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional ability connectors (power supply compatibility). Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors take no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of organization RAM. Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this department is precise simply for desktop reference ones (and so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of sure video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Supported technological solutions. This information will testify useful if you need some particular applied science for your purposes. APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs. Non-gaming benchmark performance comparing. Note that overall benchmark functioning is measured in points in 0-100 range. This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you lot find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak upward in comments section, we ordinarily fix problems speedily. This is probably the well-nigh ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation nether diverse load, providing four split benchmarks for Direct3D versions ix, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being washed in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Benchmark coverage: 25% 3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 criterion using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with 2 scenes, one depicting a daughter escaping some militarized base of operations located within a ocean cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. Information technology was discontinued in April 2017, and Fourth dimension Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead. Benchmark coverage: 17% 3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. Information technology used four tests based on two scenes, 1 being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken transport, the other is an abased temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being washed in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in Jan 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Fourth dimension Spy. Benchmark coverage: 17% Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just similar Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in Jan 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: fourteen% Criterion coverage: 14% Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 criterion for gaming PCs. It features two split up tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a peppery beast seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Burn down Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: fourteen% Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics menu criterion combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU'due south processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group. Criterion coverage: 9% Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Tempest was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a boxing betwixt two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in Jan 2020, it is now superseded past 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: 8% Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics carte benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU'southward processing ability, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API past AMD & Khronos Grouping. Criterion coverage: 5% Geekbench five is a widespread graphics bill of fare benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA. Benchmark coverage: 5% Benchmark coverage: ii% This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya thirteen engine to render a superhero free energy found static scene consisting of more 700 thousand polygons, in half-dozen unlike modes. Criterion coverage: 2% This role of SPECviewperf 12 criterion emulates work with 3DS Max, executing eleven tests in various use scenarios, including architectural modeling and animation for estimator games. Benchmark coverage: one% Let's see how skillful the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Hither are the boilerplate frames per second in a large ready of popular games across unlike resolutions: −9.8% +9.viii% −2.5% +two.5% +23.ix% −23.9% −four.four% +4.4% −66% +66% −10.7% +10.7% −4% +four% −eight.6% +8.half dozen% −187% +187% −1% +1% −3.nine% +three.ix% −6.5% +6.5% −3% +3% −9% +9% −6.3% +half dozen.3% +27.vii% −27.seven% +0.9% −0.9% −53.ii% +53.2% −11.ane% +11.one% −4.1% +iv.1% −12.two% +12.2% −166% +166% +one.iii% −one.iii% −eleven.9% +xi.9% −five.4% +v.four% −nine.iv% +9.4% −14% +xiv% −3.4% +3.4% −8.9% +8.9% −ten.9% +10.ix% +28% −28% −29.8% +29.eight% −10.6% +10.6% −3.4% +3.4% −14.3% +14.iii% −13.7% +13.7% −31.1% +31.1% −five.3% +5.3% −80.9% +80.9% −iii.8% +3.8% −nine.5% +ix.5% −8.vi% +8.vi% −48.9% +48.9% −x.half dozen% +10.six% −eleven.9% +11.9% −57.4% +57.four% +xx.5% −20.5% −78.seven% +78.seven% −6.6% +half dozen.6% −109% +109% −46.7% +46.7% −7% +7% +2.two% −2.ii% −iii.3% +3.3% −15.4% +15.four% +0% +0% −15.half-dozen% +15.6% −13.7% +thirteen.7% −25% +25% −20.eight% +twenty.viii% +x.iv% −10.4% +161% −161% −nine.8% +9.8% −xvi.7% +sixteen.7% −13.vi% +xiii.6% −47.1% +47.1% Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super since it shows ameliorate functioning. Should you all the same have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Practise you call back we are right or mistaken in our pick? Vote past clicking "Similar" button near your favorite graphics card. Nosotros believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce RTX 2060 from AMD is Radeon RX 6600, which is about equal in speed and higher by 1 position in our rating. Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce RTX 2060: The nearest GeForce RTX 2060 Super's AMD equivalent is Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary, which is faster by 1% and higher by 1 position in our rating. Compare Hither are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce RTX 2060 Super: We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with operation more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. Here you can encounter the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. Rate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 on a calibration of 1 to 5: Rate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super on a scale of 1 to v: Hither you tin ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an mistake or mismatch. Graphics settings Screen resolution FPSRTX 2060 vs RTX 2060 Super
General info
Place in functioning rating 83 52 Value for coin 53.84 78.74 Compages Turing (2018−2021) Turing (2018−2021) GPU lawmaking proper noun Turing TU106 Turing TU106 Market place segment Desktop Desktop Release date 6 January 2019 (3 years agone) 2 July 2019 (three years ago) Launch cost (MSRP) $349 $399 Price at present $428 (1.2x MSRP) $360 (0.9x MSRP) Technical specs
Pipelines / CUDA cores 1920 no data Core clock speed 1320 MHz no data Boost clock speed 1620 MHz no data Number of transistors 10,800 million 10,800 million Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 12 nm Thermal blueprint power (TDP) 175 Watt no information Texture fill rate 201.6 224.iv Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16 Length 229 mm 229 mm Width two-slot no data Supplementary ability connectors 1x 8-pivot no data Memory
Retentivity blazon GDDR6 no data Maximum RAM corporeality 6 GB no information Memory motorcoach width 192 Fleck no information Retentivity clock speed 14000 MHz no information Retentivity bandwidth 336.0 GB/s no data Shared memory - - Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C no data HDMI + no data One thousand-SYNC support + + Technologies
API support
DirectX 12 no data Shader Model vi.five vi.five OpenGL iv.6 no data OpenCL 1.2 no data Vulkan ane.ii.131 1.2.131 CUDA seven.5 seven.5 Benchmark performance
Overall score
Gaming performance
Full Hd 120 124 1440p 76 80 4K fifty 53 Total HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 79 Full Hard disk drive
Medium Preset
Assassinator'due south Creed Odyssey 92 101 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 79 81 Battleground v 145 117 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 135 141 Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 78 Far Weep v 103 114 Far Weep New Dawn 101 105 Forza Horizon 4 140 152 Hitman three 45−50 135 Horizon Nil Dawn 101 102 Red Dead Redemption ii 102 106 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 107 114 Sentry Dogs: Legion 101 104 Full HD
Loftier Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 78 85 Assassinator'south Creed Valhalla 64 68 Battleground five 129 101 Telephone call of Duty: Mod Warfare 118 117 Cyberpunk 2077 45−fifty 72 Far Weep 5 99 110 Far Cry New Dawn 97 101 Forza Horizon 4 131 147 Hitman 3 45−50 125 Horizon Nil Dawn 78 77 Metro Exodus 67 75 Ruby-red Dead Redemption ii 56 59 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 96 105 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 136 155 Scout Dogs: Legion 87 90 Full Hard disk
Ultra Preset
Assassin'south Creed Odyssey 56 61 Assassinator's Creed Valhalla 55 61 Battlefield 5 119 93 Cyberpunk 2077 45−fifty 61 Far Cry 5 94 104 Far Cry New Dawn 88 91 Forza Horizon 4 105 120 The Witcher iii: Wild Hunt 73 83 Watch Dogs: Legion 45 59 1440p
High Preset
Phone call of Duty: Modern Warfare 76 80 Hitman 3 45−fifty 85 Horizon Naught Dawn 52 54 Metro Exodus 42 46 Crimson Dead Redemption 2 35 38 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50 70 1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassinator'south Creed Odyssey 45−fifty 52 Assassinator's Creed Valhalla 42 47 Battleground five 45−50 74 Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 39 Far Cry v 45−50 84 Far Weep New Dawn 76 81 Forza Horizon 4 45−l 98 Sentry Dogs: Legion 30 44 4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 43 46 Hitman 3 45−50 46 Horizon Null Dawn 30 31 Metro Exodus 26 30 Red Dead Redemption two 24 24 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 32 37 The Witcher iii: Wild Hunt 51 58 4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin'due south Creed Odyssey 28 35 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24 29 Battlefield 5 53 48 Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 eighteen Far Cry 5 41 45 Far Weep New Dawn 42 49 Forza Horizon iv 59 67 Watch Dogs: Legion 17 25 Advantages and disadvantages
Performance rating 46.93 55.41 Novelty 6 January 2019 2 July 2019 Cost $349 $399
Bandage your vote
Competitors of GeForce RTX 2060 by AMD
Competitors of GeForce RTX 2060 Super by AMD
Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary
Similar GPU comparisons
User rating
Questions and comments
Source: https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-RTX-2060-vs-GeForce-RTX-2060-Super
0 Response to "Nvidia Rtx 2060 Vs 2060 Super"
Post a Comment